Every city and every organizing campaign are different. Some organizing efforts have chosen to call for outright bans,
others believe that pursuing policy goals to regulate the industry is a tacit acceptance of these technologies, while others have chosen to try regulatory policies as a way to mitigate the harms. Every organized community will have to consider the political conditions and the capacity they have to win their demands. The purpose of this toolkit is to describe the menu of options and pose questions that we can ask ourselves as we approach our cities to ensure that our efforts are helping abolish surveillance and not reinforce it.
By definition, 287(g) agreements offer agencies a formalized framework for collaboration with federal authorities, access to additional training, and a...
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) recently announced a new program for co-opting local sheriffs into deporting immigrants called the “Warrant...
287(g): A Legal Mechanism for State Violence 287(g) is a provision of the 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility...
We showcase existing solutions and new research from the community. Support us by sharing your own resources to our hub.
